![]() If this solution was implemented then you could remove ALL limitations on gun ownership - own any gun or ammunition you want.No. I've talked in more detail about how this could work before. The technology to do this isn't that complicated if we WANTED to. Take a gun to a cinema? It isn't going to work. Your teenage son can't be able to get hold of it when he's had a bad day.Ħ - New guns must come with a device that simply prevents them from firing outside of approved areas. Now, both of these come with some serious logistical and admin issues, so they're harder to implement.ĥ- Guns MUST be secured to a particular standard. *Some sort of provision for mental health has to go in here, and the discussion what constitutes a red flag I think could be a different thread in itself.Ĥ - You have to have completed a training course suitable for the type of weapons you own, and you have to stay current on it. Use your weapon in a dangerous way (misfire in your house, threaten a spouse etc) - you lose them for a period of time. You get them back 2 years after your sentence is complete under the condition that you haven't been arrested again (or something like this) - the precise wording would need to be worked out. This would require a database of who owns what guns, which comes with complications of its own, but these are not insurmountable.Ĭommit a class 'x' felony and get convicted? Part of your sentence is that you have to give up all of the guns registered in your name or face an extension of your sentence. Those two are easy to write into legislation.ģ - While you have a right own guns, that right CAN be removed from you under specific and detailed circumstances. Give everyone a month to cool off at least. There should be no possible way that if you're pissed off on a Monday then you can go on a killing spree on the Tuesday. ![]() You can order a gun at a show, or buy one from your buddy, but the actual firearm effectively goes through a licensed escrow before you can get it.Ģ - The waiting period for all guns needs to be expanded. Every gun purchase must go through a dealer who does the appropriate checks. I've long thought there are a number of changes that would make a difference without limiting the rights granted by the constitution and having some chance of adoption in a meaningful way.ġ - The background checks and gun show / private seller loopholes. Every law passed gets watered down so much as to be basically ineffectual, while at the same time making future laws more difficult to pass. Even talking about it does nothing more than generate resistance to any sort of future legislation in gun owners minds. A gunman could storm the capitol, wipe out the sitting government and the next one STILL wouldn't pass that legislation. There is zero chance of a constitutional amendment being written to ban guns. There are two things that people need to agree to for any movement to be made on this.įirst - the 2nd Amendment isn't going away. If you choose not to believe me, so be it.īIGUN's posts on the matter seem reasonable to me. This is my one attempt to try and get you to see that you're not in a good place when it comes to posting on this subject. But this isn't the way to get your message across. ![]() You're not even consistent in your attempt to get your crazy across. In the same paragraph you go from 'half of americans have taken the vaccine' (which is demonstrably wrong with even the simplest google search), to 'literally the entire population has taken it'. You've doubled down on your misunderstanding of the science for the past 7 months or so, with no sign of stopping. But you've lost the plot on this vaccine stuff to the point where in my mind you're now fringe-lunatic on the subject. A year ago you were a poster who I thought was worth reading - your posts were generally well constructed and thought out. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |